It is a consequence of the Second
Law that at equilibrium, the chemical potential of a substance
must be the same throughout, regardless of the number of phases
present.
(If chemical potentials were not equal throughout, it would
be possible for the system to reduce its Gibbs energy by transfer
of substance from the area of higher chemical potential to the
area of lower chemical potential. This process would be spontaneous,
so the system cannot be at equilibrium under these conditions.)
| At low temperatures, the solid phase of
a substance usually has the lowest chemical potential
(providing the pressure is not too low) and so is the
most stable phase. However, the chemical potentials
of the different phases change with temperature in different
ways. Thus as the temperature is raised, it is possible
for the chemical potential of another phase (liquid
or vapour) to fall below that of the solid. This will
then become the most stable phase, and a phase transition
should be observed (as long as it is not prevented on
kinetic grounds): |
 |
The above diagram illustrates the temperature dependence of
the chemical potential of the solid, liquid and vapour phases
of a substance. Note that in practice the lines would actually
be curved. The phase with the lowest chemical potential at any
temperature is the most stable phase at that temperature.
We have derived the relationship for the temperature dependence
of the Gibbs energy as (δG / δT)
= -S. Since the chemical potential of a pure substance is equal
to its molar Gibbs energy, it follows that:

Since every substance has a positive molar entropy, the chemical
potential of a pure substance always decreases as the temperature
is raised. Since liquids usually have a higher molar entropy
than solids, and gases have a higher molar entropy than either,
the slope of a graph of μ against T is steepest for gases
and shows the least slope for solids.
Similarly, from the pressure dependence of the Gibbs energy,
(δG / δp)
= V , we obtain

Usually, the molar volume of a liquid is greater than the molar
volume of the substance in its solid phase. In this case, increasing
the pressure increases the chemical potential of the liquid
more than the solid, and so the melting point is raised. i.e.
the liquid will condense to a solid at a higher temperature
than it did at the lower pressure. This may perhaps be more
easily understood by thinking of a higher pressure compacting
the sample together, and favouring the denser phase (usually
the solid) over the less dense one (usually the liquid).
In the unusual case where the molar volume of the solid is
greater than the liquid (eg water) increasing the pressure increases
the chemical potential of the solid more than the liquid. This
lowers the melting point.
We also need to consider the effect of the external (applied
pressure) upon the vapour pressure of a condensed phase. When
pressure is applied to a condensed phase (eg by an inert pressurising
gas, or by the action of a gas-permeable piston upon the condensed
phase) the vapour pressure rises. (This can be crudely viewed
as the extra pressure forcing particles out of the condensed
phase as gas. Thus the number of particles present in the gas
phase, and hence its pressure, increases.) The quantitative
relationship is given by the following equation:

where p is the vapour pressure when an additional pressure
ΔP is applied, and p* is the vapour pressure in the absence
of any additional applied pressure.
|